NANIBALA MAHATA DILIP KUMAR SADHU vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/25505/2025
Case under West Bengal Primary Education Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0507882025
Filing Number
WPA/25155/2025
Filing Date
04-Nov-2025
Registration No
WPA/25505/2025
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Post Retirement 90 ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANIBALA MAHATA DILIP KUMAR SADHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the District Inspector of Schools (P.E.), Jhargram to consider the petitioner's representation for family pension (filed 16th September 2025) and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks. The petitioner, a widowed daughter of a deceased Assistant Teacher (died 1974), sought family pension after her mother's death in July 2024, with both the State and petitioner's counsel agreeing to relegate the matter to appropriate authorities for decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2025
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
04-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/25505/2025
The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the District Inspector of Schools (P.E.), Jhargram to consider the petitioner's representation for family pension (filed 16th September 2025) and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks. The petitioner, a widowed daughter of a deceased Assistant Teacher (died 1974), sought family pension after her mother's death in July 2024, with both the State and petitioner's counsel agreeing to relegate the matter to appropriate authorities for decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts