PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS ABHISHEK BANERJEE vs RIDDHI SIDDHI COLD STORAGE P LTD AND ORS — MAT/1887/2025

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0503782025

Filing Number

MAT/1926/2025

Filing Date

31-Oct-2025

Registration No

MAT/1887/2025

Registration Date

31-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS ABHISHEK BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RIDDHI SIDDHI COLD STORAGE P LTD AND ORS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta condoned a 48-day delay in filing the appeal and registered the appeal filed by Punjab National Bank & Ors. against Riddhi Siddhi Cold Storage (P) Ltd. & Ors. The court found the explanation for delay satisfactory. The matter was adjourned for one week pending service of the memorandum of appeal on the respondents' advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Arijit Banerjee , Hon'ble Justice Apurba Sinha Ray

  6. 31-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/1887/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta condoned a 48-day delay in filing the appeal and registered the appeal filed by Punjab National Bank & Ors. against Riddhi Siddhi Cold Storage (P) Ltd. & Ors. The court found the explanation for delay satisfactory. The matter was adjourned for one week pending service of the memorandum of appeal on the respondents' advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case