SK. YEASIN ALI DONA GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/24176/2023
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0497202023
Filing Number
WPA/24261/2023
Filing Date
05-Oct-2023
Registration No
WPA/24176/2023
Registration Date
05-Oct-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
BONUS/GRATUITY ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SK. YEASIN ALI DONA GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Sk. Yeasin Ali, an ex-employee claiming additional gratuity for the lockout period (March 1989-November 1994). The court held that as a badli (temporary) worker during that period who did not actually work for 240+ days annually, the petitioner was not entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, despite the lockout being beyond his control. The court also rejected his claim for gratuity from 2012-2015 (post-superannuation re-employment) as he had not completed a fresh 5-year continuous service period required for renewed gratuity eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing (Group-III)
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Motion Gr - III
Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De
-
15-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
Hearing (Group-III)
Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De
-
01-Dec-2025
Motion Gr - III
Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De
-
27-Nov-2025
Motion Gr - III
Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De
-
10-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
16-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
04-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
07-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
09-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
05-May-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
07-Apr-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
16-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar ManthaView PDF
-
21-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar ManthaView PDF
-
21-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
20-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
19-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
18-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
15-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
14-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
13-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
12-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
11-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
08-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
07-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
06-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
05-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
04-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
04-Dec-2023
Group III (Motion)
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury
-
01-Dec-2023
Group - III Motion
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
-
18-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu ChowdhuryView PDF
-
13-Oct-2023
Group III (Motion)
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury
-
12-Oct-2023
Group III (Motion)
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury
-
11-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/24176/2023
Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Sk. Yeasin Ali, an ex-employee claiming additional gratuity for the lockout period (March 1989-November 1994). The court held that as a badli (temporary) worker during that period who did not actually work for 240+ days annually, the petitioner was not entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, despite the lockout being beyond his control. The court also rejected his claim for gratuity from 2012-2015 (post-superannuation re-employment) as he had not completed a fresh 5-year continuous service period required for renewed gratuity eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts