SONALI AHIR MRINMOY CHATTERJEE vs SANAT AHIR — CO/3737/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Oct-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0482682025

Filing Number

CO/3794/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

CO/3737/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONALI AHIR MRINMOY CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANAT AHIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    Case Summary: CO 3737/2025 The court granted Sonali Ahir's revision petition and transferred Matrimonial Suit No. 65 of 2025 from the Jhargram Family Court to the Bankura District Court. The court found that the petitioner/wife resides in Bankura district and would face travel difficulties attending hearings at the distant Jhargram court. The District Judge Bankura is directed to proceed with the suit with due notice to both parties and may permit virtual appearance for the respondent if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    U/S 24 Of CPC

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  5. 31-Oct-2025

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  6. 29-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/3737/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO 3737/2025 The court granted Sonali Ahir's revision petition and transferred Matrimonial Suit No. 65 of 2025 from the Jhargram Family Court to the Bankura District Court. The court found that the petitioner/wife resides in Bankura district and would face travel difficulties attending hearings at the distant Jhargram court. The District Judge Bankura is directed to proceed with the suit with due notice to both parties and may permit virtual appearance for the respondent if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case