THE BISWA BHARATI CONSTRUCTION SK. JAYED HOSSAIN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/23735/2025

Case under West Bengal Land Reforms Act ,1955 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 28th October 2025.

CNR: WBCHCA0480782025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

03rd October 2025

Filing Number

WPA/23989/2025

Filing Date

26-09-2025

Registration No

WPA/23735/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

28th October 2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Land Reforms Act ,1955 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

THE BISWA BHARATI CONSTRUCTION SK. JAYED HOSSAIN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

03-10-2025

NEW MOTION

15-05-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

14-05-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

13-05-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

12-05-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Summary of WPA/23735/2025 In this contempt petition, the court adjourned the matter to May 15, 2026, to consider whether a special officer should be appointed at the alleged contemnor's cost to ensure compliance with prior court orders regarding boundary wall reconstruction. The alleged contemnor claimed obstruction by the writ petitioner and was permitted to file supplementary affidavits documenting written complaints to administrative authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPA/23735/2025 In this contempt petition, the court adjourned the matter to May 15, 2026, to consider whether a special officer should be appointed at the alleged contemnor's cost to ensure compliance with prior court orders regarding boundary wall reconstruction. The alleged contemnor claimed obstruction by the writ petitioner and was permitted to file supplementary affidavits documenting written complaints to administrative authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case