M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. SUVADIP BHATTACHARJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. — WPA/23673/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act ,1947 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0478412025
Next Hearing
31st October 2025
Filing Number
WPA/23905/2025
Filing Date
25-09-2025
Registration No
WPA/23673/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
AWARDS/ORDERS OF INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. SUVADIP BHATTACHARJEE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
NEW MOTION
GR. - III (MOTION)
GR. - III (MOTION)
NEW MOTION (GROUP - III)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-10-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 13-04-2026 | GR. - III (MOTION) |
| 01-04-2026 | GR. - III (MOTION) |
| 02-03-2026 | NEW MOTION (GROUP - III) |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: WPA/23673/2025 The High Court at Calcutta set aside the Industrial Tribunal's award that had reinstated a worker based on a corrected date of birth. Justice Shampa Dutt found the worker's date of birth had been consistently recorded as 1962 in employment documents since 1985, but he produced a birth certificate dated only 7 days before superannuation claiming his birth year was 1966. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that late corrections of date of birth on the eve of retirement are impermissible and that documents like Aadhar cards are not conclusive proof of age. The tribunal's reliance on the belatedly-produced birth certificate was therefore erroneous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: WPA/23673/2025 The High Court at Calcutta set aside the Industrial Tribunal's award that had reinstated a worker based on a corrected date of birth. Justice Shampa Dutt found the worker's date of birth had been consistently recorded as 1962 in employment documents since 1985, but he produced a birth certificate dated only 7 days before superannuation claiming his birth year was 1966. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that late corrections of date of birth on the eve of retirement are impermissible and that documents like Aadhar cards are not conclusive proof of age. The tribunal's reliance on the belatedly-produced birth certificate was therefore erroneous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts