PARIKSHIT SARKAR SUVAM SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/3657/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th December 2025.
CNR: WBCHCA0462952023
Next Hearing
22nd September 2023
Filing Number
CRR/3686/2023
Filing Date
19-09-2023
Registration No
CRR/3657/2023
Registration Date
19-09-2023
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
12th December 2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARIKSHIT SARKAR SUVAM SINHA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
NEW MOTION
CONTESTED APPLICATION
CONTESTED APPLICATION
CONTESTED APPLICATION
CONTESTED APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-09-2023 | NEW MOTION |
| 22-05-2026 | CONTESTED APPLICATION |
| 21-05-2026 | CONTESTED APPLICATION |
| 20-05-2026 | CONTESTED APPLICATION |
| 19-05-2026 | CONTESTED APPLICATION |
Orders
Case Summary: CRR 3657/2023 The Calcutta High Court adjourned the criminal revision petition filed by Parikshit Sarkar against the State of West Bengal on 22.05.2026 due to non-appearance of the respondent and State representatives despite proper intimation. The court rescheduled the matter for 12th June 2026 for further consideration in the interest of justice and granted the petitioner liberty to seek adjournment before the trial court if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRR 3657/2023 The Calcutta High Court adjourned the criminal revision petition filed by Parikshit Sarkar against the State of West Bengal on 22.05.2026 due to non-appearance of the respondent and State representatives despite proper intimation. The court rescheduled the matter for 12th June 2026 for further consideration in the interest of justice and granted the petitioner liberty to seek adjournment before the trial court if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts