UTPAL BASU MALLIK ALOKE CHATTERJEE vs PARTHA GHOSH ,PRADHAN,SUSNIA GRAM PANCHAYAT — WPCRC /144/2025
Case under Court of Contempt Act ,1971 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0456052023
Next Hearing
21st September 2023
Filing Number
CPAN /1293/2023
Filing Date
14-09-2023
Registration No
WPCRC /144/2025
Registration Date
14-09-2023
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Civil Contempt ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UTPAL BASU MALLIK ALOKE CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
PARTHA GHOSH ,PRADHAN,SUSNIA GRAM PANCHAYAT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR
CONTEMPT
TO BE MENTIONED
TO BE MENTIONED
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-09-2023 | CONTEMPT | |
| 23-03-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED | |
| 16-03-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED | |
| 01-12-2025 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE | |
| 12-11-2025 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
Orders
The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a contempt application (WPCRC 144 of 2025) filed by Utpal Basu Mallik against Partha Ghosh after the alleged contemnor complied with the court's direction for personal appearance. The court found that the gram panchayat had determined that the private parties lacked proper sanction/permission for construction, and the matter was forwarded to the Sub-Divisional Officer for necessary action under Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings were dropped and the Rule was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a contempt application (WPCRC 144 of 2025) filed by Utpal Basu Mallik against Partha Ghosh after the alleged contemnor complied with the court's direction for personal appearance. The court found that the gram panchayat had determined that the private parties lacked proper sanction/permission for construction, and the matter was forwarded to the Sub-Divisional Officer for necessary action under Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings were dropped and the Rule was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts