DHIRENDRA NATH MONDAL DEBNATH MAHATA vs MANSUR SK. AND ORS — FMA/843/2023

Case under Partition Act ,1893 Section N.A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0439322023

Filing Number

FMAT/412/2023

Filing Date

05-Sep-2023

Registration No

FMA/843/2023

Registration Date

05-Sep-2023

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Partition Act ,1893 Section N.A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIRENDRA NATH MONDAL DEBNATH MAHATA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANSUR SK. AND ORS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF

    Case Summary - FMA No. 843/2023 The First Appellate Court admitted Dhirendra Nath Mondal's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his temporary injunction application in a partition suit. The court found that prima facie triable issues existed regarding conflicting registered deeds (Deed No. 50 vs. 53 of 1980) concerning property ownership, and that the trial judge erred in refusing injunction despite acknowledging these doubts. The appeal was admitted for full hearing, and the appellant was granted leave to file an injunction application in connection with the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Sep-2023

    For Admission

  4. 05-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMA/843/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - FMA No. 843/2023 The First Appellate Court admitted Dhirendra Nath Mondal's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his temporary injunction application in a partition suit. The court found that prima facie triable issues existed regarding conflicting registered deeds (Deed No. 50 vs. 53 of 1980) concerning property ownership, and that the trial judge erred in refusing injunction despite acknowledging these doubts. The appeal was admitted for full hearing, and the appellant was granted leave to file an injunction application in connection with the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case