PRANAB KUMAR MUKHERJEE SUBRATA PODDAR vs S. ARUN PRASAD COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION NADIA AND THE DIST MAGISTRATE AND ORS — CPAN/1524/2025
Case under Provision of Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0419282025
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
Filing Number
CPAN/1564/2025
Filing Date
01-09-2025
Registration No
CPAN/1524/2025
Registration Date
01-09-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE , HON'BLE JUSTICE APURBA SINHA RAY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE , HON'BLE JUSTICE APURBA SINHA RAY
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Civil Contempt ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRANAB KUMAR MUKHERJEE SUBRATA PODDAR
Respondent(s)
S. ARUN PRASAD COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION NADIA AND THE DIST MAGISTRATE AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE , HON'BLE JUSTICE APURBA SINHA RAY
CONTEMPT
CONTEMPT MATTER
CONTEMPT MATTER
CONTEMPT MATTER
CONTEMPT MATTER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-09-2025 | CONTEMPT |
| 08-06-2026 | CONTEMPT MATTER |
| 19-06-2026 | CONTEMPT MATTER |
| 08-05-2026 | CONTEMPT MATTER |
| 04-05-2026 | CONTEMPT MATTER |
Orders
Case Summary: CPAN 1524/2025 A contempt application was filed by Pranab Kumar Mukherjee alleging willful violation of a court order dated August 16, 2023, which directed the Land Acquisition Collector to determine compensation within 12 weeks and pay it within 2 weeks thereafter. The petitioner contended that the respondents took no action to comply with this order. The court directed service of the contempt application on the alleged contemnors, with affidavit-of-service to be filed on the next date, and adjourned the matter one week after summer vacation for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CPAN 1524/2025 A contempt application was filed by Pranab Kumar Mukherjee alleging willful violation of a court order dated August 16, 2023, which directed the Land Acquisition Collector to determine compensation within 12 weeks and pay it within 2 weeks thereafter. The petitioner contended that the respondents took no action to comply with this order. The court directed service of the contempt application on the alleged contemnors, with affidavit-of-service to be filed on the next date, and adjourned the matter one week after summer vacation for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts