NABAKUMAR PAYRA SWAPAN KUMAR PAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WP.ST/174/2024
Case under West Bengal Administrative Tribunal Act - 1985 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0407662024
Filing Number
WP.ST/177/2024
Filing Date
14-Aug-2024
Registration No
WP.ST/174/2024
Registration Date
14-Aug-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NABAKUMAR PAYRA SWAPAN KUMAR PAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Nabakumar Payra seeking compassionate appointment following his father's death by suicide while in police service in 1998. The court held that the petitioner's claim was barred by delay and laches, as he applied 17 years after his father's death (having attained majority only 10 years after), and that a tribunal's interim direction to reconsider cannot resuscitate an otherwise stale claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
04-May-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
30-Apr-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
23-Apr-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
06-Apr-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
02-Apr-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
19-Mar-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
02-Mar-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
20-Feb-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
19-Feb-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
12-Feb-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
05-Feb-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
02-Feb-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
29-Jan-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
28-Jan-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
27-Jan-2026
Old Matter 1
Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas
-
03-Sep-2024
Motion ( State Tribunal )
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
-
30-Aug-2024
Motion ( State Tribunal )
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
-
29-Aug-2024
Motion ( State Tribunal )
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
-
28-Aug-2024
Motion ( State Tribunal )
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
-
27-Aug-2024
Motion ( State Tribunal )
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
-
23-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP.ST/174/2024
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Nabakumar Payra seeking compassionate appointment following his father's death by suicide while in police service in 1998. The court held that the petitioner's claim was barred by delay and laches, as he applied 17 years after his father's death (having attained majority only 10 years after), and that a tribunal's interim direction to reconsider cannot resuscitate an otherwise stale claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts