JAGAT SAHA, PROPRIETOR OF PUSPAYAN ACHIEVERS SHIWANI SAHAW vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/19163/2025
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCA0391312025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WPA/19314/2025
Filing Date
18-08-2025
Registration No
WPA/19163/2025
Registration Date
18-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SALES TAX ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAGAT SAHA, PROPRIETOR OF PUSPAYAN ACHIEVERS SHIWANI SAHAW
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
NEW MOTION
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-08-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 11-06-2026 | APPLICATION |
| 17-04-2026 | APPLICATION |
| 16-04-2026 | APPLICATION |
| 13-04-2026 | APPLICATION |
Orders
SUMMARY: The court issued a corrigendum order dated 22.05.2026 correcting typographical errors in a prior order dated 18.5.2026. The corrections include: (1) correcting counsel's name from "Mr. Himangshu Kumar Roy" to "Mr. Himangshu Kumar Ray"; (2) correcting case citation from "WPA 19155 of 2026" to "WPA 19155 of 2025"; (3) correcting interim application number from "CAN 3 of 2025" to "CAN 3 of 2026"; and (4) adding the omitted name of counsel Mr. Prithu Dudhoria for respondent no. 9. The substantive order remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court issued a corrigendum order dated 22.05.2026 correcting typographical errors in a prior order dated 18.5.2026. The corrections include: (1) correcting counsel's name from "Mr. Himangshu Kumar Roy" to "Mr. Himangshu Kumar Ray"; (2) correcting case citation from "WPA 19155 of 2026" to "WPA 19155 of 2025"; (3) correcting interim application number from "CAN 3 of 2025" to "CAN 3 of 2026"; and (4) adding the omitted name of counsel Mr. Prithu Dudhoria for respondent no. 9. The substantive order remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts