SAMIR HALDER @ SAMIR KUMAR HALDER SOURAV MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/1381/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0378962025
Next Hearing
18th August 2025
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1407/2025
Filing Date
11-08-2025
Registration No
CRM(M)/1381/2025
Registration Date
12-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMIR HALDER @ SAMIR KUMAR HALDER SOURAV MUKHERJEE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-08-2025 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 10-04-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 09-04-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 08-04-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 07-04-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
Case Summary The court rejected Samir Halder's bail application despite him being in custody for over 3 years and 8 months. While acknowledging the prolonged detention and invoking the Supreme Court's speedy trial principle, the court found that sufficient evidence (CCTV footage and 35 examined witnesses) established his complicity in the crime. The court directed the prosecution to conclude witness examination by December 31, 2026 without conducting a de novo trial for newly arrested co-accused, permitting the petitioner to renew his bail plea thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court rejected Samir Halder's bail application despite him being in custody for over 3 years and 8 months. While acknowledging the prolonged detention and invoking the Supreme Court's speedy trial principle, the court found that sufficient evidence (CCTV footage and 35 examined witnesses) established his complicity in the crime. The court directed the prosecution to conclude witness examination by December 31, 2026 without conducting a de novo trial for newly arrested co-accused, permitting the petitioner to renew his bail plea thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts