GOPAL SANA MRINAL KANTI GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/18631/2025
Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0374882025
Next Hearing
22nd August 2025
Filing Number
WPA/18470/2025
Filing Date
08-08-2025
Registration No
WPA/18631/2025
Registration Date
11-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOPAL SANA MRINAL KANTI GHOSH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
MOTION
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-08-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 19-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 18-05-2026 | MOTION |
| 22-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 20-04-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 18631/2025 The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner's construction (95.49 sq m, 5.33m height) violated Section 23(1) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act 1973, which requires prior written permission from the Gram Panchayat for structures up to 150 sq m and 6.5m height. The petitioner admittedly constructed without obtaining this sanction, and the court found no evidence the structure pre-dated the 1973 Act. Rejecting the petitioner's repair argument, the court directed demolition within six weeks as no statutory regularization provision exists for unauthorized construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 18631/2025 The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner's construction (95.49 sq m, 5.33m height) violated Section 23(1) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act 1973, which requires prior written permission from the Gram Panchayat for structures up to 150 sq m and 6.5m height. The petitioner admittedly constructed without obtaining this sanction, and the court found no evidence the structure pre-dated the 1973 Act. Rejecting the petitioner's repair argument, the court directed demolition within six weeks as no statutory regularization provision exists for unauthorized construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts