KARTICK MONDAL SAYAN RAY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/18396/2025

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Aug-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0367052025

Filing Number

WPA/18021/2025

Filing Date

05-Aug-2025

Registration No

WPA/18396/2025

Registration Date

08-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARTICK MONDAL SAYAN RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

    The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Gram Panchayat to consider the petitioner's representation regarding allegedly unauthorized construction within six weeks, with fair hearing to both parties. The court found the private respondents failed to substantiate their claim that the construction was under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Scheme, and ordered the authority to take necessary action if the construction is found illegal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  8. 18-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/18396/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Gram Panchayat to consider the petitioner's representation regarding allegedly unauthorized construction within six weeks, with fair hearing to both parties. The court found the private respondents failed to substantiate their claim that the construction was under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Scheme, and ordered the authority to take necessary action if the construction is found illegal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case