RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND ANR KRISHNA YADAV vs DOLLY RANI BAG SINCE DECEASED REPD BY PAPIA SENGUPTA AND ORS — CO/2828/2025
Case under Consumer Protection Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0363262025
Next Hearing
06th August 2025
Filing Number
CO/2853/2025
Filing Date
04-08-2025
Registration No
CO/2828/2025
Registration Date
04-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND ANR KRISHNA YADAV
UMESH SINGH
Respondent(s)
DOLLY RANI BAG SINCE DECEASED REPD BY PAPIA SENGUPTA AND ORS
PAPIA SENGUPTA
PRASENJIT BAG
ANITA MISHRA
BHAGYASHREE MISHRA
BISHAKHA MISHRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER
EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER
EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER
MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-08-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 06-05-2026 | EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER |
| 05-05-2026 | EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER |
| 04-05-2026 | EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER |
| 20-04-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta set aside the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission's order dismissing the petitioners' appeal, finding it was passed by a single-member bench (violating quorum requirements under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019) and was wholly unreasoned with no justification provided for dismissal. The court restored the appeal for fresh consideration by the State Commission on its merits with both parties heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta set aside the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission's order dismissing the petitioners' appeal, finding it was passed by a single-member bench (violating quorum requirements under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019) and was wholly unreasoned with no justification provided for dismissal. The court restored the appeal for fresh consideration by the State Commission on its merits with both parties heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts