SUMANTA RANA SOMESH KUMAR GHOSH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/18933/2021
Case under Central Industrial Security Force Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0360602021
Next Hearing
16th December 2021
Filing Number
WPA/19070/2021
Filing Date
26-11-2021
Registration No
WPA/18933/2021
Registration Date
26-11-2021
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMANTA RANA SOMESH KUMAR GHOSH
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
NEW MOTION
FOR JUDGMENT
FOR JUDGMENT
PART HEARD MATTERS
PART HEARD MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-12-2021 | NEW MOTION |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR JUDGMENT |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR JUDGMENT |
| 21-01-2026 | PART HEARD MATTERS |
| 23-12-2025 | PART HEARD MATTERS |
Orders
Summary of WPA 18933/2021 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by CISF Constable Sumanta Rana challenging his removal from service. The court held that the disciplinary proceeding was conducted in substantial conformity with statutory procedure and natural justice principles, finding that while the petitioner repeatedly refused official communications and declined to cooperate with enquiry proceedings, the authorities made persistent efforts to serve him notice and allow participation. The court rejected allegations of bias, procedural irregularity, and disproportionate punishment, emphasizing that in a disciplined armed force, compliance with authority is essential and the petitioner's conduct of habitual non-cooperation warranted the removal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WPA 18933/2021 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by CISF Constable Sumanta Rana challenging his removal from service. The court held that the disciplinary proceeding was conducted in substantial conformity with statutory procedure and natural justice principles, finding that while the petitioner repeatedly refused official communications and declined to cooperate with enquiry proceedings, the authorities made persistent efforts to serve him notice and allow participation. The court rejected allegations of bias, procedural irregularity, and disproportionate punishment, emphasizing that in a disciplined armed force, compliance with authority is essential and the petitioner's conduct of habitual non-cooperation warranted the removal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts