M/S BINOY GHOSH ROBIUL ISLAM vs BIPLAB CHAKRABORTY & ANR — CPAN/961/2019

Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0358712019

Filing Number

CPAN/35871/2019

Filing Date

27-Aug-2019

Registration No

CPAN/961/2019

Registration Date

27-Aug-2019

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FILING AND CAVEAT SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S BINOY GHOSH ROBIUL ISLAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIPLAB CHAKRABORTY & ANR

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN/961/2019 In this contempt petition hearing dated 8.05.2026, the court adjourned the case to June 2026. The court clarified that the municipality is at liberty to take appropriate action against persons found criminally liable based on a CID report regarding alleged municipal scams, and that the pending contempt petition should not bar such action. The municipality was directed to submit an affidavit report on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak

  5. 13-Sep-2024

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak

  6. 16-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF

  7. 16-Aug-2024

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak

  8. 01-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF

  9. 01-Jul-2022

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak

  10. 30-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 27-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/961/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN/961/2019 In this contempt petition hearing dated 8.05.2026, the court adjourned the case to June 2026. The court clarified that the municipality is at liberty to take appropriate action against persons found criminally liable based on a CID report regarding alleged municipal scams, and that the pending contempt petition should not bar such action. The municipality was directed to submit an affidavit report on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case