BIDYUT KUMAR SAHA MUKTESWAR MAITY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/17448/2025

Case under West Bengal Co-operative Act ,2006 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th August 2025.

CNR: WBCHCA0354762025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

11th August 2025

Filing Number

WPA/17362/2025

Filing Date

30-07-2025

Registration No

WPA/17448/2025

Registration Date

30-07-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

26th August 2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Co-operative Act ,2006 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

BIDYUT KUMAR SAHA MUKTESWAR MAITY

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

11-08-2025

NEW MOTION

08-06-2026

GROUP - V

04-05-2026

GROUP - V

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR,HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Bidyut Kumar Saha's appeal challenging an award passed under Section 139 of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006. The court upheld the cooperative society's Rs. 15 lakh loan recovery award, rejecting Saha's argument that damaged pledged crops should be deducted from the amount due, finding he never raised this plea before the Registrar and failed to attempt repayment or claim the goods despite their perishable nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Bidyut Kumar Saha's appeal challenging an award passed under Section 139 of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006. The court upheld the cooperative society's Rs. 15 lakh loan recovery award, rejecting Saha's argument that damaged pledged crops should be deducted from the amount due, finding he never raised this plea before the Registrar and failed to attempt repayment or claim the goods despite their perishable nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case