M/S. INDORAMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY, IRC AGROCHEMICAL PRIVATE LIMITED) ELINA DEY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/18024/2024

Case under West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0348102024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

19th July 2024

Filing Number

WPA/18149/2024

Filing Date

12-07-2024

Registration No

WPA/18024/2024

Registration Date

12-07-2024

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

M/S. INDORAMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY, IRC AGROCHEMICAL PRIVATE LIMITED) ELINA DEY

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

19-07-2024

NEW MOTION

16-03-2026

URGENT MATTERS

25-02-2026

URGENT MATTERS

18-02-2026

URGENT MATTERS

01-09-2025

MOTION - 8

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE

The High Court allowed Indorama India's writ petition challenging the appellate authority's rejection of its ₹72,31,368 GST refund claim for ocean freight on imports. The appellate authority had rejected the refund citing an illegible Bill of Lading that couldn't prove foreign shipping line usage. The court directed the appellate authority to reconsider the case afresh, permitting Indorama to submit a legible Bill of Lading copy and other supporting documents within one month, ensuring a fair merit-based review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court allowed Indorama India's writ petition challenging the appellate authority's rejection of its ₹72,31,368 GST refund claim for ocean freight on imports. The appellate authority had rejected the refund citing an illegible Bill of Lading that couldn't prove foreign shipping line usage. The court directed the appellate authority to reconsider the case afresh, permitting Indorama to submit a legible Bill of Lading copy and other supporting documents within one month, ensuring a fair merit-based review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case