SWAPAN KUMAR MONDAL @ SWAPAN MONDAL AND ORS. VARSHA ROY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/16546/2025

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0337292025

Filing Number

WPA/16473/2025

Filing Date

21-Jul-2025

Registration No

WPA/16546/2025

Registration Date

21-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWAPAN KUMAR MONDAL @ SWAPAN MONDAL AND ORS. VARSHA ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

    In WPA 16546 of 2025, the High Court of West Bengal adjourned the matter and removed it from the list with liberty to mention, granting the State's request for extension of time to file the required report. The court also noted that the 3rd petitioner has deceased and his heirs need to be substituted in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Sep-2025

    Returnable Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  4. 29-Aug-2025

    Returnable Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  5. 28-Aug-2025

    Returnable Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  6. 27-Aug-2025

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

  8. 04-Aug-2025

    Motion 3

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  9. 02-Aug-2025

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  10. 31-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 21-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/16546/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In WPA 16546 of 2025, the High Court of West Bengal adjourned the matter and removed it from the list with liberty to mention, granting the State's request for extension of time to file the required report. The court also noted that the 3rd petitioner has deceased and his heirs need to be substituted in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case