BIJOY KRISHNA BERA @ BIJOY BERA UTTAM KUMAR BHATTACHARYYA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/15684/2025

Case under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act ,2013 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0318292025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

22nd July 2025

Filing Number

WPA/15513/2025

Filing Date

10-07-2025

Registration No

WPA/15684/2025

Registration Date

14-07-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act ,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

BIJOY KRISHNA BERA @ BIJOY BERA UTTAM KUMAR BHATTACHARYYA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

22-07-2025

NEW MOTION

09-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

18-02-2026

FOR ORDERS

17-02-2026

FOR ORDERS

16-02-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Case Summary: WPA 15684/2025 Petitioner: Bijoy Krishna Bera Respondent: The State of West Bengal Court: High Court at Calcutta Judge: Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Decision The court allowed the writ petition and directed the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act within four months, completing all proceedings including compensation payment. Key Facts The petitioner's land (0.29 acres) was requisitioned under the 1948 Act in 1978 for road construction but was never formally acquired. No compensation was paid despite repeated requests since 2004. The 1948 Act expired in 1997, and the 1894 Act was repealed in 2014, leaving the land acquisition incomplete. Key Reasoning The court rejected the State's delay/laches defense, holding that: (1) property deprivation without legal process violates Article 300A; (2) delay cannot negate compensation claims when circumstances shock judicial conscience; (3) the continuous nature of the land use creates ongoing cause of action; and (4) under the 2013 Act, the petitioner is entitled to fair compensation since the land has been utilized for public purpose without proper acquisition procedures or compensation payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 15684/2025 Petitioner: Bijoy Krishna Bera Respondent: The State of West Bengal Court: High Court at Calcutta Judge: Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Decision The court allowed the writ petition and directed the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act within four months, completing all proceedings including compensation payment. Key Facts The petitioner's land (0.29 acres) was requisitioned under the 1948 Act in 1978 for road construction but was never formally acquired. No compensation was paid despite repeated requests since 2004. The 1948 Act expired in 1997, and the 1894 Act was repealed in 2014, leaving the land acquisition incomplete. Key Reasoning The court rejected the State's delay/laches defense, holding that: (1) property deprivation without legal process violates Article 300A; (2) delay cannot negate compensation claims when circumstances shock judicial conscience; (3) the continuous nature of the land use creates ongoing cause of action; and (4) under the 2013 Act, the petitioner is entitled to fair compensation since the land has been utilized for public purpose without proper acquisition procedures or compensation payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case