DILIP BAIDYA PANKAJ HALDER vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/15090/2025
Case under West Bengal Highways Act ,1964 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0307142025
Next Hearing
11th July 2025
Filing Number
WPA/15015/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
WPA/15090/2025
Registration Date
05-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DILIP BAIDYA PANKAJ HALDER
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION - 3
NEW MOTION 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-07-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 01-12-2025 | NEW MOTION - 3 |
| 04-08-2025 | NEW MOTION 1 |
Orders
Summary of WPA 15090/2025 The court disposed of the petition by directing the Assistant Engineer, PWD Joynagar Sub-Division to investigate petitioner Dilip Baidya's allegation of unauthorized construction encroaching on a PWD road adjacent to his property in South 24 Parganas. The court mandated a survey with prior notice to all affected parties and ordered that if encroachment is found, removal proceedings under applicable law must be completed within 10 weeks; the petitioner must also be informed of the findings within this timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WPA 15090/2025 The court disposed of the petition by directing the Assistant Engineer, PWD Joynagar Sub-Division to investigate petitioner Dilip Baidya's allegation of unauthorized construction encroaching on a PWD road adjacent to his property in South 24 Parganas. The court mandated a survey with prior notice to all affected parties and ordered that if encroachment is found, removal proceedings under applicable law must be completed within 10 weeks; the petitioner must also be informed of the findings within this timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts