MD. BAKIBULLAH MONDAL AND ORS. GOUTAM SARDAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/15024/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act ,1889 Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jul-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0305742025

Filing Number

WPA/14939/2025

Filing Date

03-Jul-2025

Registration No

WPA/15024/2025

Registration Date

05-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act ,1889 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. BAKIBULLAH MONDAL AND ORS. GOUTAM SARDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The writ petition filed by MD. Bakibullah Mondal and others against the State of West Bengal was dismissed for default on June 10, 2026, as the petitioners failed to appear or seek accommodation at the hearing. The court found that since the petitioners were unrepresented while the State's counsel appeared, the petition could not proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Dec-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  4. 04-Aug-2025

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

  5. 15-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/15024/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition filed by MD. Bakibullah Mondal and others against the State of West Bengal was dismissed for default on June 10, 2026, as the petitioners failed to appear or seek accommodation at the hearing. The court found that since the petitioners were unrepresented while the State's counsel appeared, the petition could not proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case