M/S TITAGARH RAIL SYSTEMS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TITAGARH WAGONS LIMITED) ALISHA DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/14736/2025
Case under West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section NA. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0301882025
Filing Number
WPA/14759/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
WPA/14736/2025
Registration Date
02-Jul-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
INCOME TAX ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S TITAGARH RAIL SYSTEMS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TITAGARH WAGONS LIMITED) ALISHA DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
New Motion 1
Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 14736/2025 Titagarh Rail Systems Limited challenges a CGST Authority order (dated 31.1.2025) disallowing transitional credit and directing recovery of Rs. 2,84,45,595 for FY 2017-18 under Section 74(9) of the CGST Act with penalty. The petitioner argues the issue was already adjudicated and the amount reversed, yet the authority initiated fresh proceedings under Section 74. The court, after hearing arguments, adjourned the matter for further hearing on 25.6.2026 without passing interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Sep-2025
New Motion - 9
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury
-
04-Aug-2025
New Motion - 9
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury
-
01-Aug-2025
New Motion - 9
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury
-
31-Jul-2025
New Motion - 9
Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury
-
08-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/14736/2025
Case Summary: WPA 14736/2025 Titagarh Rail Systems Limited challenges a CGST Authority order (dated 31.1.2025) disallowing transitional credit and directing recovery of Rs. 2,84,45,595 for FY 2017-18 under Section 74(9) of the CGST Act with penalty. The petitioner argues the issue was already adjudicated and the amount reversed, yet the authority initiated fresh proceedings under Section 74. The court, after hearing arguments, adjourned the matter for further hearing on 25.6.2026 without passing interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts