DHRUBA MAJUMDER @ PRADIP KUMAR MAJUMDER SARANGAM CHAKRABORTY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2614/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0267102025
Filing Number
CRR/2565/2025
Filing Date
13-Jun-2025
Registration No
CRR/2614/2025
Registration Date
17-Jun-2025
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHRUBA MAJUMDER @ PRADIP KUMAR MAJUMDER SARANGAM CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
-
2.XXXX
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
New Motion 1
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF
Case Summary: CRR 2614/2025 Dhruba Majumder (a septuagenarian) filed a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of chargesheet no. 397 dated 23.12.2024 (Ghola PS Case 360). The petitioner claimed false entanglement and alleged malicious prosecution, noting that the opposite party filed an affidavit disclosing the case arose from misunderstanding and expressing no objection to his bail. Order: The application was admitted. The court appointed State counsel, directed the petitioner to serve the opposite party via speed post, and adjourned the matter to 29th June 2026 for further hearing with directions for the State to produce the case diary and report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/2614/2025
Case Summary: CRR 2614/2025 Dhruba Majumder (a septuagenarian) filed a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of chargesheet no. 397 dated 23.12.2024 (Ghola PS Case 360). The petitioner claimed false entanglement and alleged malicious prosecution, noting that the opposite party filed an affidavit disclosing the case arose from misunderstanding and expressing no objection to his bail. Order: The application was admitted. The court appointed State counsel, directed the petitioner to serve the opposite party via speed post, and adjourned the matter to 29th June 2026 for further hearing with directions for the State to produce the case diary and report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts