ARUN MONDAL AND ANR. TITHI MAZUMDER vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/13231/2026

Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0259862026

Filing Number

WPA/13154/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPA/13231/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN MONDAL AND ANR. TITHI MAZUMDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Arun Mondal and Tithi Mazumder challenging Punjab National Bank's e-auction notice under SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the petition became infructuous since the original auction failed due to lack of bidders. The court granted liberty to the bank to conduct a fresh e-auction in accordance with SARFAESI provisions, clarifying no merits or maintainability adjudication was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/13231/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Arun Mondal and Tithi Mazumder challenging Punjab National Bank's e-auction notice under SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the petition became infructuous since the original auction failed due to lack of bidders. The court granted liberty to the bank to conduct a fresh e-auction in accordance with SARFAESI provisions, clarifying no merits or maintainability adjudication was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case