BIJAN SIKDAR DEBAPRIYA MITRA vs DEBASIS DAS, THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA — CPAN/956/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Jun-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0254332025

Filing Number

CPAN/987/2025

Filing Date

09-Jun-2025

Registration No

CPAN/956/2025

Registration Date

09-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIJAN SIKDAR DEBAPRIYA MITRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEBASIS DAS, THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a contempt application against the University of Calcutta Registrar for violating a March 2025 court order requiring consideration of the petitioner's representation within eight weeks. While acknowledging the delay and the Registrar's promotion of others to the contested post before compliance, the court found the contempt application lacking merit because the Registrar ultimately passed a reasoned order on August 27, 2025, thereby complying with the court's directive, albeit belatedly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  4. 04-May-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  11. 14-Jan-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  15. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF

  16. 03-Dec-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  17. 01-Dec-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  18. 26-Nov-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  19. 19-Nov-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  20. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF

  21. 12-Nov-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  22. 03-Nov-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  23. 29-Oct-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  24. 01-Sep-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  25. 27-Aug-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  26. 20-Aug-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  27. 13-Aug-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  28. 06-Aug-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  29. 13-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 09-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/956/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a contempt application against the University of Calcutta Registrar for violating a March 2025 court order requiring consideration of the petitioner's representation within eight weeks. While acknowledging the delay and the Registrar's promotion of others to the contested post before compliance, the court found the contempt application lacking merit because the Registrar ultimately passed a reasoned order on August 27, 2025, thereby complying with the court's directive, albeit belatedly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case