TAPAS KUMAR KUNDU AND ANR. SUBHAJIT MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(R)/59/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0253702026

Filing Number

CRM(R)/55/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM(R)/59/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023 Section 329(4)/117(2)/109(1)/308(5)/74/324(4)/351(2)/3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAPAS KUMAR KUNDU AND ANR. SUBHAJIT MUKHERJEE

  2. 2.SHAYAMAPRASANNYA KUNDU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF

    Summary of CRM(R) 59/2026 The High Court of Calcutta allowed the bail application of petitioners Tapas Kumar Kundu and Shayamaprasannya Kundu, finding that their custodial detention was unwarranted despite charges under BNS 2023 sections relating to incidents in 2021 and June 2026. The court granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 20,000 bond each with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, with the condition that petitioners meet the Investigating Officer fortnightly until charge-sheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(R)/59/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM(R) 59/2026 The High Court of Calcutta allowed the bail application of petitioners Tapas Kumar Kundu and Shayamaprasannya Kundu, finding that their custodial detention was unwarranted despite charges under BNS 2023 sections relating to incidents in 2021 and June 2026. The court granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 20,000 bond each with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, with the condition that petitioners meet the Investigating Officer fortnightly until charge-sheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case