YESMIN BEGUM RANAJIT CHATTERJEE vs KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS — MAT/966/2026

Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0249572026

Filing Number

MAT/980/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

MAT/966/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

DEMOLITION ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YESMIN BEGUM RANAJIT CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

  2. 2.THE STATE OF W.B.

  3. 3.THE MUNICIPAL COMM. K.M.C.

  4. 4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGG. (CIVIL) BUILDING DEPT.

  5. 5.THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, NARKELDANGA P.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

    The court allowed the appellant's challenge to the lower court's dismissal of her writ petition, holding that the lower court erred in declaring her appeal to the Building Tribunal non-existent based on delay, as law does not require every aggrieved person to file an appeal independently. The court deleted the lower court's adverse observations, directed the Building Tribunal to independently hear the condonation of delay application and decide on interim relief within one month, and stayed demolition proceedings for that period, reserving all merits for the tribunal's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/966/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the appellant's challenge to the lower court's dismissal of her writ petition, holding that the lower court erred in declaring her appeal to the Building Tribunal non-existent based on delay, as law does not require every aggrieved person to file an appeal independently. The court deleted the lower court's adverse observations, directed the Building Tribunal to independently hear the condonation of delay application and decide on interim relief within one month, and stayed demolition proceedings for that period, reserving all merits for the tribunal's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case