ANUBHAB BERA SUKANTA DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — MAT/958/2026

Case under West Bengal Municipal Act ,1993 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0245842026

Filing Number

MAT/974/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

MAT/958/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL LICENCE ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Municipal Act ,1993 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUBHAB BERA SUKANTA DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: MAT 958/2026 The court quashed the lower court's order canceling Anubhab Bera's tenancy mutation and certificate of enlistment for a shop room. Finding that cancellation would deprive the appellant of livelihood before the municipality could reconsider the disputed claim (involving Respondent No.6's 2021 transfer supported by Rs.11,00,000 payment), the court remitted the matter to the municipality to redecide within six weeks based on original tenancy terms and civil suit orders, with the appellant's mutation and certificate remaining valid pending this fresh decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar , Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/958/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MAT 958/2026 The court quashed the lower court's order canceling Anubhab Bera's tenancy mutation and certificate of enlistment for a shop room. Finding that cancellation would deprive the appellant of livelihood before the municipality could reconsider the disputed claim (involving Respondent No.6's 2021 transfer supported by Rs.11,00,000 payment), the court remitted the matter to the municipality to redecide within six weeks based on original tenancy terms and civil suit orders, with the appellant's mutation and certificate remaining valid pending this fresh decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case