SHITAL CHANDRA MALIK @ SITAL CHANDRA MALIK AISHWARYA DATTA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/12526/2026
Case under National Highways Act ,1956 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0244092026
Filing Number
WPA/12297/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPA/12526/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHITAL CHANDRA MALIK @ SITAL CHANDRA MALIK AISHWARYA DATTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 12526/2026 The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the State's competent authority to supply the copy of the award to petitioners Shital Chandra Malik and Aishwarya Datta within three weeks from receipt of the court order. The petitioners had been unable to avail remedies under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 due to non-supply of the award copy despite their representation dated 13th February 2026, which the State counsel agreed to fulfill. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/12526/2026
Case Summary: WPA 12526/2026 The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the State's competent authority to supply the copy of the award to petitioners Shital Chandra Malik and Aishwarya Datta within three weeks from receipt of the court order. The petitioners had been unable to avail remedies under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 due to non-supply of the award copy despite their representation dated 13th February 2026, which the State counsel agreed to fulfill. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts