BHADU SEKH @BHADU SK AND ORS AVINABA PATRA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/12374/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0244012026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

WPA/12292/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

WPA/12374/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

10th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

BHADU SEKH @BHADU SK AND ORS AVINABA PATRA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

09-06-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

10-06-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Case Summary: WPA 12374/2026 - Bhadu Sekh & Ors. v. State of West Bengal The High Court at Calcutta struck down a no-confidence motion against the Pradhan of Sripur-II Gram Panchayat on procedural grounds. The court found that the notice served on the Pradhan was undated and did not match the dated notice given to the prescribed authority, violating Section 12(2) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, which requires identical copies. Additionally, the court held that notices to Gram Panchayat members were served on 6th June 2026 by hand delivery, failing to meet the mandatory requirement of service at least 7 clear days before the meeting. The motion was quashed as fundamentally defective, though requisitionists were permitted to resubmit a fresh motion complying with statutory procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 12374/2026 - Bhadu Sekh & Ors. v. State of West Bengal The High Court at Calcutta struck down a no-confidence motion against the Pradhan of Sripur-II Gram Panchayat on procedural grounds. The court found that the notice served on the Pradhan was undated and did not match the dated notice given to the prescribed authority, violating Section 12(2) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973, which requires identical copies. Additionally, the court held that notices to Gram Panchayat members were served on 6th June 2026 by hand delivery, failing to meet the mandatory requirement of service at least 7 clear days before the meeting. The motion was quashed as fundamentally defective, though requisitionists were permitted to resubmit a fresh motion complying with statutory procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case