SHYAMAL MONDAL DEBAPRIYA MAJUMDER vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/12331/2026

Case under Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0242722026

Filing Number

WPA/12209/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPA/12331/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMAL MONDAL DEBAPRIYA MAJUMDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 12331/2026 The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Shyamal Mondal, a Sagarpara Gram Panchayat member, by directing the Sub-Divisional Officer, Domkal Sub-Division to process his Section 213B representation against the Pradhan within four weeks. The petitioner withdrew his first representation seeking the Pradhan's disqualification for absences and was permitted to file a fresh one; the court ordered action on his second representation alleging misconduct by the Pradhan, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  6. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/12331/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 12331/2026 The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Shyamal Mondal, a Sagarpara Gram Panchayat member, by directing the Sub-Divisional Officer, Domkal Sub-Division to process his Section 213B representation against the Pradhan within four weeks. The petitioner withdrew his first representation seeking the Pradhan's disqualification for absences and was permitted to file a fresh one; the court ordered action on his second representation alleging misconduct by the Pradhan, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case