PAPPU RAY @ PAPPU YADAV CHETNA RUSTAGI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/1376/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0241562026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1369/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/1376/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PAPPU RAY @ PAPPU YADAV CHETNA RUSTAGI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
The court rejected Pappu Ray @ Pappu Yadav's bail application in a firearms case involving the shooting of Rajesh Singh. The court found that the petitioner's involvement (locus) distinguished him from co-accused Dablu Singh (who received bail), and the severity of the offense—a bullet piercing the victim's body—warranted continued custody at this stage. The petitioner may renew his bail plea after the victim's evidence concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
15-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
12-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
05-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/1376/2026
The court rejected Pappu Ray @ Pappu Yadav's bail application in a firearms case involving the shooting of Rajesh Singh. The court found that the petitioner's involvement (locus) distinguished him from co-accused Dablu Singh (who received bail), and the severity of the offense—a bullet piercing the victim's body—warranted continued custody at this stage. The petitioner may renew his bail plea after the victim's evidence concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts