ASHOKE KUMAR GUPTA SYED ARIF AHMED vs MD SHAHNAWAZ AND ANR — FAT /554/2025
Case under No Act Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED ON CONTEST on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0241142025
Next Hearing
12th June 2025
Filing Number
FMAT /193/2025
Filing Date
22-05-2025
Registration No
FAT /554/2025
Registration Date
22-05-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED ON CONTEST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOKE KUMAR GUPTA SYED ARIF AHMED
Respondent(s)
MD SHAHNAWAZ AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
CONTEMPT
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-06-2025 | CONTEMPT | |
| 20-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) | |
| 23-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) | |
| 18-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) | |
| 17-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court dismissed Ashok Kumar Gupta's appeal against an eviction decree, upholding that he became a trespasser under Section 2(g) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, after the statutory five-year moratorium expired following the original tenant's death in 2005. The court rejected his claims of independent tenancy rights through alleged handover by his father or sub-tenancy status, finding no valid landlord approval or documentary evidence, and held that any sub-tenancy would have terminated with the original tenant's demise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed Ashok Kumar Gupta's appeal against an eviction decree, upholding that he became a trespasser under Section 2(g) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, after the statutory five-year moratorium expired following the original tenant's death in 2005. The court rejected his claims of independent tenancy rights through alleged handover by his father or sub-tenancy status, finding no valid landlord approval or documentary evidence, and held that any sub-tenancy would have terminated with the original tenant's demise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts