VINDHYA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ASHIS KUMAR MUKHERJEE vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/12217/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0241032026

Filing Number

WPA/12123/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/12217/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINDHYA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ASHIS KUMAR MUKHERJEE

  2. 2.JAG MOHAN DAGA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL CHIEF SIGNAL AND TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEER

  3. 3.DEPUTY CHIEF SIGNAL AND TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEER/TELE NETWORK

  4. 4.CHIEF COMMUNICATION ENGINEER

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Urgent Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 12217/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned Vindhya Industries' technical bid was rejected for failing to submit a declaration on Rs. 100/- stamp bond paper. The High Court at Calcutta found the rejection questionable, noting the petitioner had submitted the declaration on plain paper and offered to comply with the stamp paper requirement. The court directed a status quo on the tender process and ordered respondent authorities to file a status report by June 16, 2026, with the matter adjourned to that date for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/12217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 12217/2026 Outcome: Case Adjourned Vindhya Industries' technical bid was rejected for failing to submit a declaration on Rs. 100/- stamp bond paper. The High Court at Calcutta found the rejection questionable, noting the petitioner had submitted the declaration on plain paper and offered to comply with the stamp paper requirement. The court directed a status quo on the tender process and ordered respondent authorities to file a status report by June 16, 2026, with the matter adjourned to that date for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case