SUBODH ROY @ SUBODH RAY MADHURAI SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/1368/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0240762026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/1363/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/1368/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 302/120B/34/212/201
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023 Section 103/61/3(5)/237/238
Arms Act Section 25/27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBODH ROY @ SUBODH RAY MADHURAI SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)View PDF

    The court corrected typographical errors in its June 5, 2026 order: "17 witnesses" should read "70 witnesses" and "investigation" should read "trial" in paragraph 3. The amended paragraph reflects that only 3 of 70 witnesses have been examined, with trial delays caused by requests for statements under Section 183 BNSS 2023 and T.I. Parade, raising concerns about future trial completion. The remainder of the original order remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)View PDF

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Apurba Sinha Ray

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Apurba Sinha RayView PDF

  6. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/1368/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court corrected typographical errors in its June 5, 2026 order: "17 witnesses" should read "70 witnesses" and "investigation" should read "trial" in paragraph 3. The amended paragraph reflects that only 3 of 70 witnesses have been examined, with trial delays caused by requests for statements under Section 183 BNSS 2023 and T.I. Parade, raising concerns about future trial completion. The remainder of the original order remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case