SANJAY YADAV @ SANJOY YADAV MADHURAI SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/1365/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0240752026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1362/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/1365/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY YADAV @ SANJOY YADAV MADHURAI SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
The Calcutta High Court rejected Sanjay Yadav's bail application in a property dispute case where he had been in custody for 11 months. The court denied bail citing that some accused persons remain absconding and the State's allegations that the petitioner inflicted the vital blow, despite the charge-sheet being filed with 28 prosecution witnesses and two co-accused already on bail. The petitioner was permitted to renew the bail application after the charge consideration stage concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
15-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
12-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
05-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
03-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/1365/2026
The Calcutta High Court rejected Sanjay Yadav's bail application in a property dispute case where he had been in custody for 11 months. The court denied bail citing that some accused persons remain absconding and the State's allegations that the petitioner inflicted the vital blow, despite the charge-sheet being filed with 28 prosecution witnesses and two co-accused already on bail. The petitioner was permitted to renew the bail application after the charge consideration stage concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts