JALAL MOLLA SANDIP DINDA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/1337/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0240172026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1349/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/1337/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JALAL MOLLA SANDIP DINDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
-
2.XXX
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
The court rejected Jalal Molla's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 376(3) and POCSO Act Section 6. Despite the petitioner being in custody for 2.5 years with only one of 14 witnesses examined, the court found the victim's statement under CrPC Section 164 and medical report sufficiently corroborative, holding that sole victim testimony is legally sufficient in such offences. The trial court was directed to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
15-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
12-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
05-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
03-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/1337/2026
The court rejected Jalal Molla's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 376(3) and POCSO Act Section 6. Despite the petitioner being in custody for 2.5 years with only one of 14 witnesses examined, the court found the victim's statement under CrPC Section 164 and medical report sufficiently corroborative, holding that sole victim testimony is legally sufficient in such offences. The trial court was directed to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts