XXXX SOUPAL CHATTERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/1336/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0240062026
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1348/2026
Filing Date
26-05-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/1336/2026
Registration Date
26-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
XXXX SOUPAL CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
NEW BAIL APPLICATION
NEW BAIL APPLICATION
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 12-06-2026 | NEW BAIL APPLICATION |
| 11-06-2026 | NEW BAIL APPLICATION |
| 05-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 03-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court rejected the bail application of Soupal Chatterjee, who had been in custody for eight months on charges under Sections 64(2)(f)(m)/351(2) BNS 2023 related to Chanchal Police Station Case No. 1458 of 2025. The court declined bail at the current stage since the chargesheet was submitted but the case had not yet been committed to the sessions court. The court directed the magistrate to expedite commitment proceedings and complete charge consideration within 45 days, allowing the petitioner to re-approach the court after victim evidence is recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court rejected the bail application of Soupal Chatterjee, who had been in custody for eight months on charges under Sections 64(2)(f)(m)/351(2) BNS 2023 related to Chanchal Police Station Case No. 1458 of 2025. The court declined bail at the current stage since the chargesheet was submitted but the case had not yet been committed to the sessions court. The court directed the magistrate to expedite commitment proceedings and complete charge consideration within 45 days, allowing the petitioner to re-approach the court after victim evidence is recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts