MOHADDAS SK ASRAF MANDAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/1332/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0239752026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1341/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/1332/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHADDAS SK ASRAF MANDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
Case Summary: CRM(M) 1332/2026 The High Court at Calcutta rejected Mohaddas Sk's bail application in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) where he is the sole accused alleged to have fatally assaulted a woman. Though the petitioner had been in custody for 3 years 11 months with only 5 of 20 witnesses examined, the court found the offense gruesome based on case materials and declined release. The trial court was directed to complete at least 10 witness examinations within one year, after which the petitioner may renew his bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
05-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
03-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Apurba Sinha Ray
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/1332/2026
Case Summary: CRM(M) 1332/2026 The High Court at Calcutta rejected Mohaddas Sk's bail application in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) where he is the sole accused alleged to have fatally assaulted a woman. Though the petitioner had been in custody for 3 years 11 months with only 5 of 20 witnesses examined, the court found the offense gruesome based on case materials and declined release. The trial court was directed to complete at least 10 witness examinations within one year, after which the petitioner may renew his bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts