UJJAL @ UJJWAL MONDAL AND ANR. SOURAV MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/1325/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0238892026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/1330/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/1325/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UJJAL @ UJJWAL MONDAL AND ANR. SOURAV MUKHERJEE
-
2.TUBAI GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
The court dismissed the bail application filed by Ujjal Mondal and co-accused in a murder and arms act case (Chapra PS Case No. 563/2024). The court rejected their bail plea on grounds that insufficient progress had been made in the trial—only one witness had been examined despite an earlier March 6, 2026 directive instructing the petitioners to renew their bail application after four witnesses were examined. Finding no change in circumstances, the court directed the petitioners to comply with the earlier order and approach the court thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
15-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
12-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Jun-2026
New Bail Application
Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/1325/2026
The court dismissed the bail application filed by Ujjal Mondal and co-accused in a murder and arms act case (Chapra PS Case No. 563/2024). The court rejected their bail plea on grounds that insufficient progress had been made in the trial—only one witness had been examined despite an earlier March 6, 2026 directive instructing the petitioners to renew their bail application after four witnesses were examined. Finding no change in circumstances, the court directed the petitioners to comply with the earlier order and approach the court thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts