Haldia Development Authority SWARAJIT DEY vs The Haldia Water Services Private Limited — AO-COM/28/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0238782026
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
FMAT/187/2026
Filing Date
26-05-2026
Registration No
AO-COM/28/2026
Registration Date
26-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Money Claims/Compensation/Damages/Mesne Profits ( 33 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Haldia Development Authority SWARAJIT DEY
Respondent(s)
The Haldia Water Services Private Limited
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
FOR ADMISSION
MANDAMUS APPEAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 03-06-2026 | MANDAMUS APPEAL |
Orders
Case Summary: AO-COM/28/2026 Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta partially allowed Haldia Development Authority's appeal, modifying the lower court's injunction order. The court distinguished between fixed license fees (Rs. 24 crores annually, undisputed) and incremental revenue sharing (65.5% of water sales above baseline), restricting the injunction to only incremental revenue claims, not fixed license fees. Key Reasoning: The trial judge erred by restraining deductions of fixed license fees, which the respondent (water company) never disputed. The court found the dispute centered solely on the appellant's January 2026 claim for incremental revenue on unrealized water charges without compensating for consumer defaults under the concession agreement's Article 13.5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: AO-COM/28/2026 Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta partially allowed Haldia Development Authority's appeal, modifying the lower court's injunction order. The court distinguished between fixed license fees (Rs. 24 crores annually, undisputed) and incremental revenue sharing (65.5% of water sales above baseline), restricting the injunction to only incremental revenue claims, not fixed license fees. Key Reasoning: The trial judge erred by restraining deductions of fixed license fees, which the respondent (water company) never disputed. The court found the dispute centered solely on the appellant's January 2026 claim for incremental revenue on unrealized water charges without compensating for consumer defaults under the concession agreement's Article 13.5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts