TUHIN SANKAR BHATTACHARJEE NEELAM KUMARI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2253/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0234182026

Filing Number

CRR/2204/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

CRR/2253/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 498A/323

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TUHIN SANKAR BHATTACHARJEE NEELAM KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.SHAON BHATTACHARJEE (SARKAR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application seeking expedited disposal of G.R. Case No. 636/2016, which had stalled for 3.5 years since charge framing on January 30, 2023, with no prosecution witnesses examined despite six being proposed. The court directed the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Court, Barrackpore to make best efforts to conclude the trial preferably within six months from the next hearing date, finding the delay unjustified and prejudicial to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/2253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application seeking expedited disposal of G.R. Case No. 636/2016, which had stalled for 3.5 years since charge framing on January 30, 2023, with no prosecution witnesses examined despite six being proposed. The court directed the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Court, Barrackpore to make best efforts to conclude the trial preferably within six months from the next hearing date, finding the delay unjustified and prejudicial to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case