SUDHIR SHAW KUSHAL KUMAR MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRA/339/2009
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0232902009
Filing Number
CRA/23290/2009
Filing Date
14-May-2009
Registration No
CRA/339/2009
Registration Date
14-May-2009
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUDHIR SHAW KUSHAL KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
Summary of CRA 339/2009 - SUDHIR SHAW v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the criminal appeal and affirmed the conviction and sentence, with modification for time already served. Key Findings: The court upheld convictions under IPC Sections 304 Part II/34 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder with common intention) and 324/34 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons). The evidence of multiple eyewitnesses, including injured witnesses, consistently established that appellants assaulted the deceased with cricket bats, stumps, stones, and brick bats during a playground quarrel over cricket boundary markers, resulting in fatal head injuries. Medical evidence confirmed death from ante-mortem head trauma. Though the occurrence arose spontaneously without premeditation, the appellants' knowledge that such violent assault was likely to cause death satisfied Section 304 Part II requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Judgment
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
For Judgment
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
19-Nov-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
18-Nov-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
17-Nov-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
14-Nov-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
13-Nov-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
10-Jun-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
26-Mar-2025
Part Heard Matters
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
22-Jul-2024
Criminal Appeal Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
21-May-2024
Criminal Appeal Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
13-Mar-2024
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
13-Mar-2024
Personal Appearance
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
19-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
19-Feb-2024
Personal Appearance
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
15-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
15-Dec-2023
To Be Mentioned
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
16-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
16-Oct-2023
Criminal Appeal Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
13-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Justice Ananya BandyopadhyayView PDF
-
07-Aug-2023
To Be Mentioned
Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
-
28-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2009
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/339/2009
Summary of CRA 339/2009 - SUDHIR SHAW v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL Court Decision: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the criminal appeal and affirmed the conviction and sentence, with modification for time already served. Key Findings: The court upheld convictions under IPC Sections 304 Part II/34 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder with common intention) and 324/34 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons). The evidence of multiple eyewitnesses, including injured witnesses, consistently established that appellants assaulted the deceased with cricket bats, stumps, stones, and brick bats during a playground quarrel over cricket boundary markers, resulting in fatal head injuries. Medical evidence confirmed death from ante-mortem head trauma. Though the occurrence arose spontaneously without premeditation, the appellants' knowledge that such violent assault was likely to cause death satisfied Section 304 Part II requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts