AMRITA DUTTA AVIRUP CHATTERJEE vs DIBYARUP DATTA PRAMANIK — CO/1748/2026

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0232052026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

22nd May 2026

Filing Number

CO/1761/2026

Filing Date

21-05-2026

Registration No

CO/1748/2026

Registration Date

21-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

AMRITA DUTTA AVIRUP CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

DIBYARUP DATTA PRAMANIK

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

22-05-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Case Summary: CO/1748/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's revisional application challenging a trial court order that postponed her stay application to June 24, 2026. The petitioner sought to set aside an ex-parte divorce decree granted on February 23, 2026, claiming she never received summons. The court granted a limited interim restraint order restraining the respondent from contracting marriage until June 24, 2026, finding the trial court erred in not considering an interim stay when the application was timely filed and involved marital rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/1748/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's revisional application challenging a trial court order that postponed her stay application to June 24, 2026. The petitioner sought to set aside an ex-parte divorce decree granted on February 23, 2026, claiming she never received summons. The court granted a limited interim restraint order restraining the respondent from contracting marriage until June 24, 2026, finding the trial court erred in not considering an interim stay when the application was timely filed and involved marital rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case