AMRITA DUTTA AVIRUP CHATTERJEE vs DIBYARUP DATTA PRAMANIK — CO/1748/2026
Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0232052026
Filing Number
CO/1761/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
CO/1748/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMRITA DUTTA AVIRUP CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIBYARUP DATTA PRAMANIK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF
Case Summary: CO/1748/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's revisional application challenging a trial court order that postponed her stay application to June 24, 2026. The petitioner sought to set aside an ex-parte divorce decree granted on February 23, 2026, claiming she never received summons. The court granted a limited interim restraint order restraining the respondent from contracting marriage until June 24, 2026, finding the trial court erred in not considering an interim stay when the application was timely filed and involved marital rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CO/1748/2026
Case Summary: CO/1748/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's revisional application challenging a trial court order that postponed her stay application to June 24, 2026. The petitioner sought to set aside an ex-parte divorce decree granted on February 23, 2026, claiming she never received summons. The court granted a limited interim restraint order restraining the respondent from contracting marriage until June 24, 2026, finding the trial court erred in not considering an interim stay when the application was timely filed and involved marital rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts