M/S MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED AYUSHI MISHRA vs CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND AND ORS. — WPA/11773/2026
Case under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act ,1988 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0230522026
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
Filing Number
WPA/11661/2026
Filing Date
21-05-2026
Registration No
WPA/11773/2026
Registration Date
21-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
PROVIDENT FUND ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED AYUSHI MISHRA
Respondent(s)
CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND AND ORS.
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (COMPLIANCE-I) REGIONAL OFFICE HOWRAH
THE RECOVERY OFFICER/ ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: WPA 11773/2026 The court granted the writ petition by Murlidhar Ratanlal Exports Limited challenging an EPF certificate (06.04.2026) and recovery notice (13.05.2026) issued while an appeal was pending before the Central Industrial Tribunal. The court stayed both the certificate and recovery notice until the tribunal adjudicates the matter, and directed RPF authorities to refrain from coercive action during the pendency of the appeal. The court also flagged the tribunal's vacancy since May 2025 and urged urgent government action to appoint a regular Presiding Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPA 11773/2026 The court granted the writ petition by Murlidhar Ratanlal Exports Limited challenging an EPF certificate (06.04.2026) and recovery notice (13.05.2026) issued while an appeal was pending before the Central Industrial Tribunal. The court stayed both the certificate and recovery notice until the tribunal adjudicates the matter, and directed RPF authorities to refrain from coercive action during the pendency of the appeal. The court also flagged the tribunal's vacancy since May 2025 and urged urgent government action to appoint a regular Presiding Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts