SUJIT MONDAL AND OTHERS BIKASH CHANDRA HALDER vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2182/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0230362026
Next Hearing
03rd August 2026
Filing Number
CRR/2166/2026
Filing Date
21-05-2026
Registration No
CRR/2182/2026
Registration Date
21-05-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Maintenance Proceeding ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUJIT MONDAL AND OTHERS BIKASH CHANDRA HALDER
KANTA MONDAL
KALYANI MONDAL
AJIT MONDAL
SUMITRA DAS
BHANJAN DAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
SUKANYA SARDAR (MONDAL)
Hearing History
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION 1
NEW MOTION 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 03-08-2026 | NEW MOTION 1 |
| 12-06-2026 | NEW MOTION 1 |
Orders
Case Summary: CRR/2182/2026 The petition was admitted. Petitioners challenged the lower court's order (18.03.2026) issuing a warrant of arrest against the opposite party for non-payment of Rs. 1,48,000 in arrears. The High Court found merit in petitioners' argument that after 4 years from complaint filing and 1 year from High Court directions, evidence remained incomplete (P.W.2 partially examined), making arrest premature without attempting early disposal. Matter adjourned to August 2026 monthly list; petitioners directed to serve the opposite party via speed post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRR/2182/2026 The petition was admitted. Petitioners challenged the lower court's order (18.03.2026) issuing a warrant of arrest against the opposite party for non-payment of Rs. 1,48,000 in arrears. The High Court found merit in petitioners' argument that after 4 years from complaint filing and 1 year from High Court directions, evidence remained incomplete (P.W.2 partially examined), making arrest premature without attempting early disposal. Matter adjourned to August 2026 monthly list; petitioners directed to serve the opposite party via speed post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts