JAHEDA KHATUN AND OTHERS ANUBRATA MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/2203/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

Next hearing 03-Aug-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0229902026

Filing Number

CRR/2158/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

CRR/2203/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 498A/406/34
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAHEDA KHATUN AND OTHERS ANUBRATA MUKHERJEE

  2. 2.MD. SHAKIL @ JUMMAN

  3. 3.MOUSINA BEGAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.FARHIM KHANAM

Case History

  1. 03-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Aug-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar MukherjeeView PDF

    Case Summary: CRR 2203/2026 Outcome: The petition was admitted and proceedings in the underlying criminal case (CGR 4291/2019) were stayed for 12 weeks as against the three petitioners. The court found petitioners had made out an arguable case requiring merit adjudication, noting the complainant never cohabited with them in Kolkata after moving to Bangalore three weeks post-marriage, undermining allegations of dowry harassment under IPC Sections 498A/34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/2203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR 2203/2026 Outcome: The petition was admitted and proceedings in the underlying criminal case (CGR 4291/2019) were stayed for 12 weeks as against the three petitioners. The court found petitioners had made out an arguable case requiring merit adjudication, noting the complainant never cohabited with them in Kolkata after moving to Bangalore three weeks post-marriage, undermining allegations of dowry harassment under IPC Sections 498A/34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case